ANOTHER PATSY ... ANOTHER COVERUP

ANOTHER PATSY ...


... ANOTHER COVER UP



By David Icke
Copyright David Icke, 2010. All Rights Reserved

The Obama administration announced its opposition this week to plans for a new investigation to establish who was really behind the anthrax attacks that followed 9/11 in 2001.
Five people were killed and another seventeen were infected by anthrax contained in letters sent to the news media and two Democratic Senators.

This opposition to a new investigation comes from the same President Fake who said:
'My Administration is committed to creating an unprecedented level of openness in government. We will work together to ensure the public trust and establish a system of transparency, public participation, and collaboration.'
Like almost everything else that appears on Obama's teleprompter or passes his lips, it was a lie. The FBI recently closed the anthrax case after an 'investigation' that would give the word 'pathetic' a bad name and the Obama administration is being employed to ensure it never reopens.

The reason for this is simple: the need to continue to keep from the public the fact that the US military-intelligence and Israeli Mossad network was behind the attacks as part of the concerted campaign to instigate the 'war on terror' after 9/11.

We were told at first that Osama bin Laden or Saddam Hussein could have been behind the attacks (yeah, right), but then it became clear that the source of the anthrax was the US military. As the New Scientist magazine put it:

'The DNA sequence of the anthrax sent through the US mail in 2001 has been revealed and confirms suspicions that the bacteria originally came from a US military laboratory. The data released uses codenames for the reference strains against which the attack strain was compared.

The two reference strains that appear identical to the attack strain most likely originated at the US Army Medical Research Institute for Infectious Diseases at Fort Detrick (USAMRIID), Maryland.
The new work also shows that substantial genetic differences can emerge in two samples of an anthrax culture separated for only three years. This means the attacker's anthrax was not separated from its ancestors at USAMRIID for many generations.

The FBI 'investigation' focused at one point on Steven Hatfill an American virologist and bio-weapons expert who was described by the Department of 'Justice' as a 'person of interest'.
It proved to be a costly error. Hatfill sued on the grounds that the Justice Department violated his privacy by speaking with reporters about the case and he settled in 2008 for $5.8 million.

The story was back in the headlines in August 2008 when Dr Bruce E Ivins, a top 'biodefence' researcher at Fort Detrick, was said to have committed suicide.

The media reported that the FBI had been about to charge Ivins with the anthrax killings, but a Washington grand jury said that an indictment had not been imminent. Congressman Rush Holt, who represents the area where the anthrax letters were mailed, said the evidence against Ivins was only circumstantial
Germ warfare scientists said there was no evidence that Ivins had the ability to turn anthrax into a powder that could be inhaled and, anyway, there was no identifiable motive for Ivins to commit the crimes.

Truth, justice and evidence, however, are hardly the mottos of federal prosecutors and 'investigators', and they announced that Ivins did the deed and, here we go, worked alone.

They threw in the usual blatant lies that included the claim that 'the genetically unique parent material of the anthrax spores ... was created and solely maintained by Dr. Ivins.' This was nonsense, as biological warfare and anthrax expert, Dr Meryl Nass, said:

'Let me reiterate: No matter how good the microbial forensics may be, they can only, at best, link the anthrax to a particular strain and lab. They cannot link it to any individual.'

It turns out that Ivins was only one of some 100 people who could have handled the vial used in the attacks. Richard Spertzel, a microbiologist who led the United Nations' biological weapons inspections of Iraq, also said that the anthrax used could not have come from the lab where Ivins worked.
The FBI failed to find any anthrax spores at Ivins' house or on anything belonging to him and nor could they show that he ever went near the mailbox in New Jersey from where the anthrax was posted.

But, hey, the guy's dead and can't defend himself so, er, he did it.

The anthrax had been 'weaponized' - the spores made small enough to stay suspended in the air for long periods of time so they could be breathed in. This can be done by adding large amounts of silica to remove the 'electrostatic charge' and allow the tiny particles to float in the air.

The anthrax in one letter included 1.4 per cent of silica which was described by experts as a 'shockingly high proportion' that would only be expected in anthrax that had been deliberately 'weaponized'.

Jeffrey Adamovicz, who supervised Ivins at Fort Detrick, said that Ivins had neither the skills nor the means to attach silicon to anthrax spores. Richard Spertzel pointed out that the facility did not handle anthrax in powdered form - 'I don't think there's anyone there who would have the foggiest idea how to do it.'

The FBI said, ludicrously, that the presence of such high levels of silica was just a case of 'natural variability' when the bioweapons experts were saying that such levels could only be there if the silica had been deliberately added.

The FBI then embarked on a pathetic and doomed attempt to prove that the silica could have been added through accidental absorption. But the scientists contracted to do this at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratories failed in 56 attempts to support the FBI claims.

Far from adding 1.4 per cent of silica to anthrax, the results were nowhere even close to that with some attempts as low as .001%.

In short, the anthrax posted in 2001 had been through a process that only top military scientists had the know-how and technology to perform and Dr Bruce E. Ivins was just another 'patsy' to take the blame and hide the real culprits - the government/ military/intelligence cabal.

Congressman Rush Holt, who has closely followed the case from the start, managed to include wording in the 2010 Intelligence Authorization Bill requiring the Inspector General of the Intelligence Community to investigate the possibility of a foreign connection to the 2001 anthrax attacks.

Holt said this in a letter to the Chairmen of the House Committees on Homeland Security, Judiciary, Intelligence, and Oversight and Government Reform:

I am writing to ask that your committees, either individually or jointly, conduct a probing investigation of our government's handling of what has been known as the "Amerithrax" investigation.
As you are aware, last week the Federal Bureau of Investigation announced it was formally closing its investigation into the 2001 anthrax letter attacks, commonly known as the "Amerithrax" investigation. The Bureau has maintained since his suicide in 2008 that the late Dr. Bruce Ivins was their principal suspect in the attacks, a conclusion reaffirmed by the FBI when it closed the case last week-despite the fact that the FBI's entire case against Ivins is circumstantial, and that the science used in the case is still being independently evaluated.

To date, there has been no comprehensive examination of the FBI's conduct in this investigation, and a number of important questions remain unanswered. We don't know why the FBI jumped so quickly to the conclusion that the source of the material used in the attacks could only have come from a domestic lab, in this case, Ft. Dietrick. We don't know why they focused for so long, so intently, and so mistakenly on Dr. Hatfill. We don't know whether the FBI's assertions about Dr. Ivins' activities and behavior are accurate. We don't know if the FBI's explanation for the presence of silica in the anthrax spores is truly scientifically valid. We don't know whether scientists at other government and private labs who assisted the FBI in the investigation actually concur with the FBI's investigative findings and conclusions. We don't know whether the FBI, the Department of Homeland Security, the Department of Health and Human Services, and the U.S. Postal Service have learned the right lessons from these attacks and have implemented measures to prevent or mitigate future such bioterror attacks.

The American people need credible answers to all of these and many other questions. Only a comprehensive investigation-either by the Congress, or through the independent commission I've proposed in the Anthrax Attacks Investigation Act (H.R. 1248)-can give us those answers ...

... Given its track record in this investigation, I believe it is essential that the Congress not simply accept the FBI's assertions about Dr. Ivins alleged guilt. Accordingly, I ask that your committees investigate our government's handling of the attacks, the subsequent investigation, and any lessons learned and changes in policies and procedures implemented in the wake of the attacks.

Others on Capitol Hill are supporting Holt in his demands for a new investigation and this is why the Obama administration went public this week in its opposition to such a move.
Peter Orszag, director of Obama's Office of Management and Budget, sent a letter to leaders of the House and Senate Intelligence committees saying that a plan to reopen the anthrax investigation 'would undermine public confidence' in the original FBI investigation 'and unfairly cast doubt on its conclusions'. So never mind that the FBI named the wrong man and its 'investigation' was a disgrace, we mustn't seek to identify the right man, or men, because it would 'undermine public confidence' in the FBI.

A Bloomberg (http://www.bloomberg.com/) report this week even suggested that Obama could veto legislation authorizing the next budget for US intelligence agencies if a new investigation is agreed. What was it the guy said again?

'My Administration is committed to creating an unprecedented level of openness in government. We will work together to ensure the public trust and establish a system of transparency, public participation, and collaboration.'

There have been so many corrupt and often evil people who have become US President, but few have had an image so far from reality than Barack Obama. The man is a fraud and a liar of staggering proportions and definitely in the league of world class genetic liars like Tony Blair.

The anthrax story is still more confirmation, not that any more is needed, that the same shadow cabal with the same unfolding agenda remains in power no matter who is officially 'in charge' between the farce we call 'elections'.

The anthrax attacks happened during the administration of Bush and Cheney which was controlled and directed by the so-called neoconservative, or neocon, networks headed by people like Richard Perle, Paul Wolfowitz, John Bolton and William Kristol.

The continued cover-up of what happened is now being led by Obama and co who are supposed to be the political opponents of the neocons and the Republicans. Why would they have an interest in suppressing information that would expose the duplicity of the political opposition in killing Americans?

Because the same network that controls the neocons controls Obama. It has been an extraordinarily seamless transition from the 'right wing' Bush to the 'left wing' Obama. In truth they are but one 'wing' and it flaps to order.

The anthrax story is yet another example and there will be so many more



(Note: This newsletter, along with others going back to 2005, is available to view on http://www.davidicke.com/  by logging in and clicking on "newsletter archive" on the left-hand side menu)





.